4.8 • 729 Ratings
🗓️ 27 September 2024
⏱️ 50 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Father Thomas Davenport explores how electromagnetic radiation fits into a Thomistic view of nature, discussing the unique properties of light, Aquinas' misconceptions, and the complexities of light-matter interactions from both classical and quantum perspectives.
This lecture was given on July 19th, 2024, at The Dominican House of Studies. This publication was made possible through the support of Grant 63391 from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.
For more information on upcoming events, visit us at thomisticinstitute.org/upcoming-events
About the Speaker:
Fr. Thomas Davenport, O.P., is professor of philosophy at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome, where he teaches philosophy of nature and epistemology. He has written and spoken on the relationship of faith and science in a variety of venues, including being a main contributor to the Thomistic Evolution project. He was ordained to the priesthood in 2017 and is working on his second PhD in philosophy.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome to the Tomistic Institute podcast. |
0:06.8 | Our mission is to promote the Catholic intellectual tradition in the university, the church, and the wider public square. |
0:13.1 | The lectures on this podcast are organized by university students at Temistic Institute chapters around the world. |
0:19.1 | To learn more and to attend these events, |
0:21.7 | visit us at to mystic institute.org. |
0:25.4 | So there have been roughly 75 versions of this talk in my head |
0:29.5 | over the last three weeks or so, |
0:31.6 | and at least 10 in the last two hours. |
0:33.8 | So we'll see exactly where this goes. |
0:36.1 | First, some framing quotes. I was very |
0:39.5 | pleased when Dr. Hasting had a quote from Richard Feynman, because while philosophically, there are |
0:44.6 | odd little quips he makes. Pedagogically, he's just an amazing teacher of physics. I spent a lot |
0:50.3 | of time reading his lectures on light and QED to remind myself of what I had forgotten. |
0:54.5 | So it was very helpful. |
0:55.8 | But in doing that, I came across a quote which struck me interestingly. |
1:00.1 | It says, physicists always have a habit of taking the simplest example of any phenomenon |
1:05.0 | and calling it physics, leaving the more complicated examples to become concerns of other fields, |
1:09.5 | say applied math, electrical engineering, chemistry, or crystallography. Even solid-state physics is really only half |
1:15.5 | physics because it worries too much about special substances. For instance, one of the important |
1:20.3 | properties of crystals or most substances is that their electric polarizability is different |
1:26.0 | in different directions. But in physics, we usually start out talking about the special case in which the polarizability is different in different directions. |
1:27.5 | But in physics, we usually start out talking about the special case in which the polarizability |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Thomistic Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Thomistic Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.