meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Civics 101

When the Supreme Court Got It Wrong: Civil Rights and Dred Scott

Civics 101

NHPR

Government, Society & Culture, History

4.22.6K Ratings

🗓️ 1 March 2022

⏱️ 51 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In 1846, Dred and Harriet Scott were living in St. Louis, Missouri with their two daughters. They were enslaved and launched a not uncommon petition: a lawsuit for their freedom. Eleven years later Chief Justice Roger B. Taney would issue an opinion on their case that not only refused their freedom but attempted to cement the fate of all Black individuals in the United States.   This episode is a broadcast special that aired across the nation on NPR, and is two parts: our episode on how the Supreme Court works, and part one of our series on landmark civil rights cases: Dred Scott v Sandford.  CLICK HERE: Visit our website to see all of our episodes, donate to the podcast, sign up for our newsletter, get free educational materials, and more! To see Civics 101 in book form, check out A User's Guide to Democracy: How America Works by Hannah McCarthy and Nick Capodice, featuring illustrations by Tom Toro. Check out our other weekly NHPR podcast, Outside/In - we think you'll love it! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Civics 101, I'm Hannah McCarthy.

0:02.0

I'm Nick Capity-J.

0:03.1

Today we have got a special two-part episode for you about the Supreme Court and civil rights

0:07.5

that aired as a broadcast special on NPR stations around the country.

0:11.7

First we are going to give a truly 101 explanation about how the judicial branch works,

0:17.0

its powers, its checks, what it can do, and what it cannot do.

0:21.3

And then we will dive into a case that many historians have referred to as

0:26.0

the worst Supreme Court decision in US history. Dred Scott, V. Sandford.

0:33.2

Now Hannah there is a lot of vocabulary headed our listeners way in the first part of this episode.

0:38.3

But hopefully everyone's going to come out of the other side understanding the definition of

0:43.6

judicial review, searcher-rary, or search for short, circuit courts, and circuit court splits,

0:51.3

and also listeners are going to learn about one of my favorite.

0:54.2

Here comes favorite decisions of all time, the one that started it all,

1:00.2

Marbury V. Madison, 1803. This case has everything Hannah, judicial commissions, angry John Adams,

1:08.8

midnight judges. You sound like Bill Haters' Stefan character on SNL.

1:15.1

Does this case have Dan Cortez?

1:16.7

Sadly there's no Dan Cortez in Marbury V. Madison.

1:19.7

Alright, let's do it, Civics 101 style with a breakdown of the judicial branch.

1:24.6

You got it.

1:29.7

This little telegway came and showed a piece of paper.

1:34.9

And Mrs. Maff demanded to see the paper and to read it, see what it was.

1:40.4

The first plaintiff was Jane Rowe, an unmarried pregnant girl who had sought an abortion in his

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from NHPR, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of NHPR and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.