meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
iilluminaughtii

When AI Art Becomes Exploitative and Unethical | Corporate Casket

iilluminaughtii

Blair Zoń

Documentary, Education, Business, Society & Culture

4.4961 Ratings

🗓️ 4 February 2023

⏱️ 25 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Welcome to the Corporate Casket, a weekly series where bad businesses go to die. AI has been writing and creating art more and more recently; while these programs can be fun to use, it’d led to an uptick of people in these industries fearing for their jobs. Will book covers become AI generated? What about the books themselves? What about the articles reporting on these books? Connect With Me: https://linktr.ee/iilluminaughtii’ Sources: https://justpaste.it/39gcr Writers/Researchers/Helpers: Ali Z-B This episode was edited and mixed by: G. Thomas Craig Album cover art created by: Betsy Primes Intro Song Credits: Trauma- Will Van De Crommert Outro Song Credits: Electronica Punch- Oleksandr Koltsov Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

AI is coming for your job and soon it's going to take over the world. Just kidding that's not

0:16.1

necessarily the case here but especially in recent weeks AI has been getting a lot of

0:21.0

negative attention thanks to the lawsuits piling up against it.

0:24.9

At first, the lawsuit seemed like it was a matter of artists fighting against the machine.

0:29.3

PR Newswire reported that three of them, Sarah Anderson, Kelly McKernan, and Carla Ortiz,

0:34.4

filed a lawsuit against Stability AI, Deviant Art, and Mid Journey due to copyright infringement.

0:40.4

Deviant Art, by the way, recently made its own AI Art Gener art generator called Dream Up so that's kind of what that's in reference to

0:45.8

Now according to the complaint images contained in the Lion data set were downloaded and used by these generators without compensation or consent

0:54.5

from those artists. The three also expressed concern saying that they had to stick up

0:59.6

for their profession and hard work before they were effectively replaced by a machine.

1:04.4

Many may argue that hey that's not a risk because AI doesn't really have the capability of

1:08.4

being original, but do humans really have that ability anymore.

1:13.0

Isn't everything out there to some extent derivative of something we already know?

1:17.3

Before we get too philosophical here, let's get back to if AI should even be allowed to do

1:21.5

something like this in the first place.

1:23.2

Frankly, the question of AI being fair use is kind of a tricky one because while anyone

1:27.8

can look at a public image with no problem, if they're using it to create another separate image and then profiting from it, is that fair use?

1:36.0

Shouldn't these artists be protected by copyright, especially when AI is being trained on their images and in essence recreating them.

1:44.0

Plus, any of the art that AI does create won't have any copyright protection whatsoever

1:49.0

either because the US won't give copyright protection to works solely created by a machine.

1:55.2

Looking at it from these essential basic angles, the complaints these artists make seem incredibly

1:59.6

valid, and it's a bit hard to be sympathetic towards a machine anyway.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Blair Zoń, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Blair Zoń and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.