Sadhguru, you are talking about liberating Hindu temples from the clutches of the government.

If that happens, I understand management can be done by anybody.

But who should actually be in touch with the deity?

Will it again go back to the Brahmins?

Sadhguru, is this the only way to run a temple?

Okay.

I'm not talking about it.

I'm, I'm just trying to translate what is written in the constitution,

as to how any spiritual or if you want to call it religious spaces should be managed or run.

The fundamental rights in the country and in most parts of the world,

almost every democratic nation, everybody can run their spiritual and religious institutions the way they want.

Those who want will go there, those who don't want will not go there.

So should a particular community come back?

This issue of only one community should be inside the temple.

I think we have settled it with the Dravidian moments.

Communities were formed on the basis of profession.

If you're a carpenter, you're one kind of Achari.

If you're a goldsmith, you're another kind of Achari.

If you're a blacksmith, you're another kind of Achari.

If you're a trader, you're one kind of Vaishya.

If you're a agricultural tourist, you're another kind.

If you're a militant class, you're one kind.

...