meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Excerpt

What we learned from oral arguments in transgender care case

The Excerpt

USA TODAY

Daily News, News

4.11.2K Ratings

🗓️ 5 December 2024

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

USA TODAY Supreme Court Correspondent Maureen Groppe gives some of the main takeaways from Wednesday's oral arguments debating whether bans on puberty blockers for transgender minors are discriminatory.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy may be exempt from ethics rules as Donald Trump's advisors. Plus, Donald Trump DEA pick Chad Chronister withdraws from consideration, and Trump taps Paul Atkins as SEC chairman.

The search for a shooter continues after UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was killed in New York.

USA TODAY Reporter Andrea Riquier discusses the housing crisis, the American Dream and what the next Trump administration can do about it.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Wondery Plus subscribers can listen to USA Today's The Excerpt, Ad-Free right now.

0:05.6

Join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app.

0:12.9

Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson. And today is Thursday, December 5th, 2024.

0:18.3

This is the excerpt.

0:22.5

Today we break down yesterday's Supreme Court arguments over transgender care, plus

0:27.4

some new developments as a new administration takes shape, and the latest from the aftermath

0:31.9

of a brazen killing in New York. The Supreme Court yesterday debated whether states can prevent transgender adolescents from

0:40.7

using puberty blockers and hormone therapy.

0:43.7

And acted in 2023, a law in Tennessee bans doctors from giving such care to a minor

0:48.9

seeking treatment for gender dysphoria.

0:51.6

It's similar to bans approved in more than 20 other states.

0:55.1

I caught up with USA Today's Supreme Court correspondent, Maureen Gropi, for a look at what we

0:59.3

learned during the high court's oral arguments yesterday. Maureen, thanks for making some time today.

1:04.7

Thanks for having me on. What arguments did we hear from attorneys for the Justice Department

1:09.4

and the American Civil Liberties Union who are representing the families challenging Tennessee's ban?

1:14.4

They said that Tennessee's law does require greater scrutiny because it does discriminate.

1:19.1

And their main argument for that is the example of a teenager whose sex assigned at birth is male may be given testosterone to treat delayed puberty, but a teenager

1:29.7

assigned female at birth who wants testosterone to treat gender dysphoria may not have it.

1:35.0

Tennessee's lawyer said that the state is restricting treatments based on what they're being used

1:39.7

for and based on the patient's age, not because of their sex or transgender status.

1:44.8

So they say it's not discrimination.

1:47.2

And they say that they can do that because there's a difference in what these treatments do

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from USA TODAY, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of USA TODAY and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.