meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
City Journal Audio

What We Know about the Crime Spike

City Journal Audio

Manhattan Institute

Politics, News Commentary, News

4.8615 Ratings

🗓️ 27 July 2022

⏱️ 46 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Rafael A. Mangual and Peter Moskos discuss the causes of the post-2020 crime spike, how violence affects everything from quality of life to childhood education, and the distance between theory and practice in the criminal-justice world. Mangual’s new book, Criminal (In)Justice: What the Push for Decarceration and Depolicing Gets Wrong and Who It Hurts Most, is out now.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to City Journal's 10 Blocks podcast.

0:20.0

This is Rafael Menguall, a contributing editor of City Journal and a senior fellow here at the Manhattan Institute.

0:25.8

I'm also the author of the new book Criminal Injustice.

0:28.5

And I am joined today by Professor Peter Moscos, who's a professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

0:34.9

He's a national expert on policing and crime. He's the director of

0:39.0

John Jay's NYPD Executive Master's Program, graduate of Princeton and Harvard, where he was trained as a

0:45.1

sociologist. He's also a former Baltimore City police officer who happens to be working on another book.

0:51.8

Peter, thank you so much for joining. It's an honor. Thanks for inviting me on. It's good to see you.

0:56.7

Likewise. Likewise. It's always great to talk to you. So let's get right into it. Here at

1:01.4

City Journal, my colleagues and I, we've very extensively covered the post-2020 crime spike,

1:07.4

something that you've commented on quite a bit. And that spike followed a renewed push to place new

1:13.6

restrictions on police discretion and in some cases to defund departments altogether. Some of us here

1:20.6

have suggested that there may be a connection between that push and the elevated crime levels that

1:24.6

cities like New York and Chicago and Philadelphia have been experiencing over the last couple of years.

1:29.3

Now, these suggestions are often met with earnest declarations that police don't actually prevent crime.

1:36.3

We're told that they merely respond to crime after the fact.

1:39.3

Now, some of the people making these sorts of claims, I think, know better, but others, I have a

1:45.4

suspicion sincerely believe this to be true. How do you respond to this line of argument?

1:50.9

What should our listeners say when they hear the same thing at their dinner tables?

1:55.3

I think it's important to distinguish between good faith and bad faith criticism of policing. There's a lot of

2:04.3

reform I've supported, reform that actually makes things better. Now, you may not know that

2:09.0

after the fact, mind you, but at some point you have to judge the consequences of actions,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Manhattan Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Manhattan Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.