meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Liz Wheeler Show

What if the Green Agenda Was a Culture War? ft. Emily Jashinsky

The Liz Wheeler Show

Blaze Media

Daily News, News Commentary, News

4.94.2K Ratings

🗓️ 18 November 2022

⏱️ 15 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Republicans are playing by the rules of the Democrats when it comes to green energy and climate change, and it’s about time for that to stop. What if Republicans were unified around the idea that the green energy agenda is a war on the middle class? Culture Editor at The Federalist Emily Jashinsky joins Liz to share her take on how we can actually win this battle in terms of both ideological messaging and policy implementation. One thing is abundantly clear—it might affect your kitchen table, but the green agenda is not a kitchen table issue. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, welcome to the Liz Wheeler Show. I'm Liz Wheeler. We are, yes, you guessed it.

0:05.4

At Matt Conn three in Miami. Still here. This is how many interviews that we've been doing

0:09.9

dawn to dusk day after day because there's so many good speakers, so many good panelists

0:13.5

here that I want to talk about. I want to talk to not talk about at least not all there

0:17.9

on the set. With me now is the culture editor at the Federalist Emily at Gisinski. Emily

0:22.7

good to see you. Good to see you, Liz. Okay. So you recently wrote a piece at the Federalist

0:27.3

in which you very politely criticized the Republican Party at large for how they have

0:33.7

framed the messaging on green energy and climate change. I want to be a little more blunt

0:39.7

and a little less polite and you and say Republicans have really messed this up, have made

0:45.4

it, have actually played by the terms set by the Democratic Party on electric vehicles,

0:51.0

on fossil fuels, on climate change. And that's terrible. That's a huge disservice to the

0:56.2

American. What should we be doing instead? Well, you know, think of one thing, the so-called

0:59.4

inflation reduction act oddly was supported by eggs on mobile. It's basically a climate

1:04.7

bill and it was supported by eggs on mobile. So there's a lot of money to be made actually

1:08.5

in new energy. Of course, there's still a lot of money in fossil fuels, but there are

1:12.8

a lot of people who are invested in new energy and will make a lot of money off of it. And

1:17.6

a lot of those people are Republican donors. A lot of those people are, you know, in the

1:21.5

consulting world. And I think that has some influence over it, but to your point, on

1:27.4

a broader level, I mean, when I was researching the PC reference, I was looking at a study

1:31.6

from Berkeley that crunched the number since 2005 or six and of the truly insane amount

1:37.6

of money that has been spent in federal subsidies since the Bush administration, the majority

1:43.8

of it, something like 65% has gone to upper energy. And federal subsidies for green energy,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Blaze Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Blaze Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.