The Spectator magazine combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority.

Subscribe today for just £12 and receive a 12 week subscription in print and online, plus a £20 £20,000 absolutely free. Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash voucher. Hello and welcome to a special

Saturday edition of Coffee House Shots. I'm Katie Balls and I'm joined by Fraser Nelson and James

Seif. On Friday, we heard Alex Saland address MPs from the Scottish Parliament. After much

rescheduling James, finally the former

First Minister did give evidence relating to the Samud Inquiry and this has implications for

Nicola Sturgeon. So what do we learn? I think that there were three big standout moments to my mind.

First, Alex Hammond's final word in his final statement, he's

essentially said to the committee, if you want to get hold of this evidence, you should serve

an order on my solicitors because they want to comply with your requests to produce these

text messages that Alex Hamon kept referring to, which he said were the most kind of shocking day of his

life when he read them, which he claims proves what he is alleging about an attempt essentially

to use the legal process to take him out as a political figure. That was thing one. The second thing

I think was, but Alex Salmon seemed to go out of his way to contradict

Peter Morrell's sworn evidence to the committee. And I mean it's very hard to see how the committee

doesn't once again write to Peter Morrill and ask him to come back and explain the discrepancies

between what Peter Morrill said on oath to the committee and what Alex Salmon said on

the oath to the committee. And then I think the third thing is this issue of whether one of the

names of the complainants was disclosed to the Salmon's team and Sammon said that that had

happened and that there were three people who could testify to that effect.

I think that is very significant because one of the big arguments throughout this process has been that the reason that evidence is being redacted, evidence is being withheld,

is to prevent the jigsaw identification of the claimants.

...