meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
MLex Market Insight

US states grapple with biometric-data regulation; and Singapore’s green antitrust campaign

MLex Market Insight

MLex Market Insight

News

4.99 Ratings

🗓️ 14 January 2022

⏱️ 19 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The collection and storage of biometric data is now occurring on an industrial scale in the United States. However, with no federal privacy rules in place, it has been largely left to the states to develop a data-privacy framework. To date, the states haven’t had much success — but that doesn’t mean that biometric-data regulation is off the agenda in 2022. Also on today’s podcast: how Singapore’s antitrust regulator is gearing up to take into account environmental policy objectives.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to Emlix's podcast, the first for the year. I hope you've managed to take a break

0:15.8

and that you're looking forward to what 2022 has in store. Hopefully things will be a little easier than they have been in

0:23.2

2021. My name is James Panicki. I'm from Emlex's Asia Pacific team and now make sure you've

0:30.2

scanned your eye retinas and handed over all of your biometric data for today's program because

0:36.3

we'll be taking a look at the many but

0:38.9

largely unsuccessful attempts to regulate the acquisition and storage of such data in

0:45.0

the US and for antitrust fans in about 10 minutes time we'll be crossing to

0:50.5

Southeast Asia to discuss Singapore's attempts to have competition and environmental

0:55.8

policy settings working alongside one another in perfect harmony. It's something that's likely

1:01.9

to resonate across the region. First up though, yes, we are now all familiar with biometric data.

1:08.7

In fact, you could argue that we always have been. It's hard to think of a TV crime show where the detective doesn't refer to fingerprints, for example. But the collection and storage of biometric data is now occurring on an industrial scale. In the US, where there's no national privacy legislation in place, it has been

1:29.2

left to the states to attempt to create a regulatory framework, and it hasn't been an especially

1:35.6

successful endeavour so far. Amy Miller is a senior correspondent covering privacy, data

1:41.5

security and antitrust from our offices in San Francisco, and she

1:46.5

joins me now. So, Amy, why did so many states propose bills relating to biometric information?

1:55.3

Well, there's been growing concerns over the misuse of this highly sensitive personal information,

2:00.6

and it's been fueling government

2:02.1

investigations, and it's also led to some eye-popping class action settlements with tech

2:07.4

companies.

2:08.3

And in general terms, what did these proposals from U.S. States aim to do? What was the

2:15.3

intention? Well, most of the state biometric

2:17.7

proposals are modeled after the 2008 Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, or BIPA, as it's commonly

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from MLex Market Insight, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of MLex Market Insight and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.