meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The A.M. Update

U.S. v Skrmetti Kicks Off | How Does THIS Happen in New York City?! | 12/5/24

The A.M. Update

Aaron McIntire

Daily News, News, Politics

4.9833 Ratings

🗓️ 5 December 2024

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The conversation covers significant topics including the Supreme Court case US vs. Skrmetti, which challenges a Tennessee law banning meatball surgeries in the name of gender for minors, the tragic shooting of a CEO in New York City, and Donald Trump's righteous about-face on his DEA appointment. 

 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

It's Thursday, December 5th, 2024.

0:02.5

One of the most consequential Supreme Court cases of our era gets underway.

0:06.4

A major CEO gets capped in broad daylight on the streets of New York City.

0:10.9

And Joy Reid of MSNBC justifies my vote for Donald Trump.

0:14.8

Next on the AM update.

0:28.1

Tomorrow. Tomorrow is another edition of Ask or Tell Me Anything on the AM Update.

0:29.6

You can ask me any question you want.

0:33.0

Tell me any news story you think needs covered that I didn't get to this week.

0:35.4

Make your submissions at Real AM Update on X.

0:37.3

That's at Real AM Update on X.

0:39.0

Look for the PIN tweet. And now on with the Thursday edition. The U.S. v. Scrimetti got underway at the Supreme Court yesterday.

0:43.9

That case stems from a Tennessee law that bans meatball surgery and chemical castrations in the

0:49.3

name of gender for children. The ACLU, along with the Biden administration, sued Tennessee to block that law.

0:57.0

The Supreme Court earlier this year took that case up and heard arguments yesterday.

1:01.7

Some of the more galling statements that I've ever heard from any official within our government took

1:07.3

place yesterday. We'll start with Justice Kintanji Brown Jackson, who compared

1:11.9

banning meatball surgery in the name of gender for children. How she compared that to banning

1:17.2

interracial marriage. Being drawn by the statute. That was sort of like the starting point.

1:21.9

The question was whether it was discriminatory because it applied to both races and it wasn't necessarily invidious or whatever.

1:29.6

But, you know, as I read the statute here, excuse me, the case here, you know, the court starts

1:35.3

off by saying that Virginia is now one of 16 states which prohibit and punish marriages on the

1:39.9

basis of racial classifications. And when you look at the structure of that law, it looks in terms of

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Aaron McIntire, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Aaron McIntire and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.