It's Monday night, you're watching Tisky Sour and we have four massive stories for you this evening.

Our main story, which we'll be talking about, but quite a large part of the show,

is Priti Patel's brutal plan to begin deporting people to Rwanda from tomorrow.

There have been some defeats in the court for those wanting to stop those flights,

but we've also seen an eruption of action on the street.

I'm also going to be talking about a court case, Carol Kudwolleder,

has beaten Aaron Banks, and he was unsuccessful in suing her for libel,

and we've got a Keir Starmer polling story. It's not looking great for him,

and some truth bombs from an unexpected place about the rail strikes.

I'm joined all evening by Ash Sarkar. How are you doing, Ash?

I'm very well. How are you?

I'm not so bad. Enjoying the sun. Although we do have some pretty serious topics to talk about tonight,

this week sees the first big test of the government's brutal plan to deport asylum seekers to

Rwanda if they've arrived in the UK by irregular routes. As we discovered last week,

the first ever flight in the controversial programme is planned for this Tuesday,

so tomorrow, and a decision today in the Court of Appeal means that flight can go ahead.

This was the summing up. In any event, we agree with the judge that applications for entry

and relief in this context must be considered on an individual basis and not a generic basis.

Otherwise, the respondent could be prevented from implementing her policy or removal,

even in a case in which there is no legal defect in the individual decision-making process.

At all, turn to the fundamental point in this case, which turns on how the judge dealt with

the balance of convenience. In our judgment, he conducted that balancing exercise properly.

...