4.8 • 2.2K Ratings
🗓️ 18 February 2023
⏱️ 43 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This week in virology, the podcast about viruses, the kind that make you sick. |
0:10.4 | From micro TV, this is twiv this week in virology episode 984 recorded on February 16th, |
0:20.8 | 2020-23. I'm Vincent Racken, yellow and you're listening to the podcast all about viruses. |
0:27.0 | Joining me today from New York, Daniel Griffin. Hello everyone. I haven't seen you in a long time, |
0:34.5 | Daniel. It's been a while. It's been minutes. And then I spent two hours recording something else just |
0:41.4 | now. We're tired of hearing each other, but hopefully you're not. Yeah. All right. Well, |
0:47.2 | let's get right into it. We have a lot to cover today. Yes, there will be one point in time when |
0:51.6 | hopefully I did not say that, but we will start off with our quotation when people talk, listen |
0:57.8 | completely. Don't be thinking what you're going to say. Most people never listen. And that's from |
1:02.7 | Ernest Hemingway across the river and into the trees written in 1967, the year I was born. |
1:08.8 | I will admit to being a huge Ernest Hemingway fan, but let us start off with the brief report, |
1:15.1 | the political polarization of COVID-19 treatments among physicians and laypeople in the United |
1:21.5 | States published in PNAS. So the most disturbing part of this study is that it underscores that |
1:28.8 | many physicians, so-called experts, are forming their opinions based not on reading the actual |
1:35.3 | scientific publications, but rather instead from the media. So in this study, the participants read |
1:42.0 | an abridged research abstract, that's for the physicians, or a research summary written in a |
1:48.4 | journalistic style, as for the laypeople, both of which reported the results of the together trial, |
1:55.1 | a well-powered randomized control trial that failed to find evidence that an anonymous therapeutic |
2:02.3 | GL-22 was effective for treating COVID-19. First, they listed beliefs about the studies in |
2:09.2 | formativeness, its methodological rigor and the likelihood that its authors were biased. Then, |
2:16.7 | they identified the GL-22 as Ivermectin. Participants who were more conservative now reported |
2:24.0 | that the evidence was less informative. The study was less methodologically rigorous, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Vincent Racaniello, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Vincent Racaniello and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.