So Trump is doing it again. He's throwing his DOJ lawyers under the bus. These DOJ lawyers really need to be careful because they may find themselves losing their bar license soon, getting disciplined, getting sanctioned, and just having their reputations tarnished as Donald Trump doesn't give a crap about them. They're like cannon fodder for him.

You know, when you look at this recent New York Times Siena poll that analyzed the issue of a lot of

issues, but also how American people feel about Abrago Garcia. Donald Trump's 21 points underwater.

He's negative 21. Only 31% of Americans approve of the way

Trump is dealing with the Abrago Garcia situation by defying Supreme Court orders to facilitate

the return of Abrago Garcia. So Trump was asked about Abrago Garcia in this recent Time magazine interview, and the Time

magazine interviewer said, you know, are you aware that you're defying the court order? It was a nine to

zero decision saying, facilitate the return of Abrago Garcia. The Time magazine reporter then read

from the Supreme Court's order and from the lower court's order.

And then Donald Trump's response was, I leave that to my lawyers.

I give them no instruction.

And then he says that his lawyers actually told him something very different about what the ruling said. He said that my lawyers did not say

that that's what the ruling said, and I rely on what my lawyers ultimately tell me to do.

Here's just the questioning. You committed to complying with all Supreme Court orders. Yeah.

When you and I last spoke in April, are you still committed to complying with the Supreme Court order? Yeah. When you and I last spoke in April, are you still

committed to complying with the Supreme Court order? Sure, I believe in the court system. The Supreme

Court ruled 9 to 0 that you have to bring Abrago Garcia back. You haven't done so. So aren't you

disobeying the Supreme Court? Well, that's not what my people told me referring to his lawyers.

They didn't say it was.

They said it was.

They said it was nine to nothing or something entirely different.

So then the reporter goes, okay, I'll quote from the ruling, quote, the order properly

...