Donald Trump's lawyers state that while the threats against Judge Ingoron and Judge Ingoron's

principal law clerk may be, quote, vile and reprehensible, Trump argues in a new filing they do not constitute a clear and present danger of

imminent harm as required under established precedent. Apparently for Donald Trump and Donald Trump's lawyers,

it's going to take somebody to be killed or attempted to be killed

before a gag order can be imposed. I'm Ben Mycellus from the Midas Touch Network.

Abhorant is perhaps the right word to describe Donald Trump's most recent

filing before the appellate division first department in New York where

Donald Trump is challenging Judge in Goron's very narrowly tailored gag

order which basically states do not attack my principal

law clerk which Donald Trump and Trump's lawyers continue to do.

Donald Trump filed an emergency petition a few weeks back under Article 78, which is essentially

initiating a new lawsuit against Judge in Goron to demand the appellate division, take immediate

administrative action to block certain behavior by administrative officers.

It's a rarely used device and not applicable

here as the New York Attorney General points out in their briefing. This is not the

appropriate procedure for even challenging a gag order like this.

Nonetheless, the appellate division first department judge granted temporary relief as they did earlier before the

trial even started in this New York attorney general civil fraud case and

temporarily lifted the gag order imposed by Judge and Goron.

Now there's briefing before a full panel in the appellate division.

So Donald Trump filed the first brief, then the New York Attorney General's

office filed their brief through the Solicitor General's office in New York,

...