Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case challenging President Trump's

authority to impose sweeping tariffs.

Economics correspondent Paul Salman has a preview.

To me, the most beautiful word in the dictionary is tariff.

Donald Trump's campaign zest for tariffs has become a fixation of his second term.

You know I've used tariffs for lots of different reasons.

Tariffs, as you know, are starting to come in at record levels.

And with tariffs, we're the wealthiest nation ever in the history of the world.

President Trump first imposed sweeping tariffs, taxes on imported goods, in February, executive orders

on Canada, Mexico, and China, calling their collective failure to stem the flow of drugs here

a national emergency.

They're sending massive amounts of fentanyl, killing hundreds of thousands of people a year

with a fentanyl. In April, on Liberation Day, the President announced tariffs on virtually all U.S. trading

partners, plus country-specific, so-called reciprocal tariffs.

The emergency, large and persistent trade deficits.

Such horrendous imbalances have devastated our industrial base and put our national security

at risk.

In short, chronic trade deficits are no longer merely an economic problem.

They're a national emergency that threatens our security and our very way of life.

Many of the tariffs were, as you've doubtless heard,

later amended, paused, even removed. But tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear challenges

to their legality. Specifically, the president's use of a 1977 emergency law to levy tariffs

...