It's time for Justice Matters with former federal prosecutor and MS NBC analyst,

Plen Kirchner. The new filing by Special Counsel Jack Smith not only contains plenty of evidence about

Donald Trump's crimes but there's also dirt on his co-conspirators.

Here's Glenn with his take.

So friends, there's a reason Jack Smith included in his new court filing tons of information and evidence about the crimes committed

by Donald Trump's co-conspirators.

Guys like Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman,

Sidney Powell, Kenneth Chesborough, and others.

It's because the law deems that once somebody

joins a criminal conspiracy. deems that person is

person is guilty of every single crime committed by every single member of the conspiracy,

whether that person personally participated in the crime or not.

Okay, friends, so let's assume everybody's in their seats, we've already taken attendance,

we've got our notebooks out, and we're ready for a quick team justice law school class on two topics.

One, co-conspirator liability,

and two, the admissibility of co-conspirator statements. But don't worry friends I'm going to do this in English not in

legalese. So first let's quickly tackle co-conspirator liability.

First of all, a conspiracy is just an agreement

by two or more people to do crime, to commit a crime.

And one co-conspirator has to take one step, do one thing toward the commission of the crime.

That's what we call an overt act.

So a conspiracy charge, two people agree to commit a crime and

...