RFK Jr.'s threatening to block big pharma advertising, and I am all for it.

This money goes to cable networks where almost every commercial, because their audience is over 70, is a bunch of drugs.

And this is what keeps these media narratives locked in place.

Big pharmaceutical companies, big money dumping tens of billions of, well, literally a $10 billion market into media.

And then what happens, it's quite simple.

You may be wondering why it is that YouTube was banning certain ideas related to medications in 2020.

There are a lot of conspiracies, and some of them may be more true than others,

but I'll give you one simple one that probably played a big role.

When people were going on YouTube and advocating for cheap, low-cost medicines,

one, there is insurance and liability where YouTube's like,

dude, don't give medical

advice. But then why block doctors who literally can give medical advice? Well, they shouldn't.

It's not their patient, to be honest. So that is a component. Money, money, big pharmaceutical

companies were like YouTube. We spend billions on ads on your platform.

If you're going to have people making all these viral videos claiming that what we produce

is bad for them, we're going to pull our advertising.

And YouTube goes, holy crap, big pharma ads, make the world go round.

I say, RFK, let's roll. Now, some people have said, but Tim, this would violate

the First Amendment. And I say, maybe, maybe. There are a lot of limitations on speech that

we've already agreed upon. In fact, the founding fathers, nobody ever really agreed with free speech. So spare me this.

You know, these liberals come to me and they're like, you're not believe in free speech. I'm like,

oh, the founding fathers didn't believe in free speech. They had blasphemy laws. They signed a

...