meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Property Podcast

TPP205: What does the Housing White Paper mean for landlords

The Property Podcast

Rob Bence & Rob Dix

Investing, Education, Business News, News, Business

4.82K Ratings

🗓️ 16 February 2017

⏱️ 21 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

It's been much anticipated but what does it all mean?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello everyone it's episode 205 of the property podcast Rob B here with Rob D the government

0:05.2

has once again been sticking a nose into property what have they done and how is it going to

0:10.4

affect you find out this week.

0:13.0

Yes, that pesky government is at it again.

0:20.0

Welcome to the Property Podcast. We're going to be getting into all the details of the housing white paper,

0:24.7

which came out this week. We've also got a resource for you, which you'll be a big fan of,

0:30.0

if you're interested in the Northern Power House. But before we get to any of that,

0:34.3

let's kick off with our news story this week. So this week's story is from the

0:39.6

telegraph and the headline is Stamp Duty Receipts saw as by to let investors are undeterred by tax hike.

0:47.0

And the story is basically saying that Stamp Duty revenues were up 18% in 2016 compared to 2015 and it also says that one in

0:58.7

five of all the houses bought in the second half of 2016 were what they're calling additional

1:05.4

properties so like second homes by to letts and so on and that raised a lot more

1:10.4

money than they'd expected. So Stamp duty revenues specifically from additional

1:15.6

homes was much higher than expected. So that's made up a big proportion of the overall increase

1:20.8

in the Stamp duty take.

1:22.7

So I think that's really interesting and it kind of raises the question of, well, does that mean

1:27.0

that the policy has worked or not?

1:29.7

From the government's point of view, is this good news? It's a funny one because if the policy the idea of it

1:36.2

was to raise more tax overall then it worked. It raised more than they thought it would.

1:40.9

But if the aim of the policy was to deter investors and therefore

1:46.7

benefit first-time buyers, clearly it didn't work because the real story here seems to be that investors haven't been deterred anyway.

1:55.4

So while lots of people were rushing in to get in before April when the new rules came in,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Rob Bence & Rob Dix, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Rob Bence & Rob Dix and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.