President Donald Trump has followed through on his threat to veto the National Defense

Authorization Act, which is a massive, I think it's like $750 billion bill that essentially

authorizes national defense.

There's a couple interesting things in it most notably is an amendment that was added

in July that curtails the president's power to invoke the Insurrection Act.

It would require some kind of certification through Congress, which essentially defeats

the purpose of the Insurrection Act, I guess, but Trump vetoed it not because of this.

He vetoed it because he said section 230 of the Communications Decency Act must be repealed.

Now that would be a huge mistake.

It would likely result in, you know what, I don't, I wonder if they would ban this show.

They probably would.

We probably banned instantly.

You'd see the likes of Stephen Crowder, Ben Shapiro.

They'd be gone overnight because what section 30 does is it makes it so that YouTube

can't be sued for the thing said by me, Ben Shapiro or Calculinsky or Stephen Crowder

or anything like that that you'd have to actually sue those individuals for defamation if

they defamed you.

If you get rid of Section 230, then you would just sue YouTube for YouTube, you know, is

the one who published the content.

I certainly think Section 230 has its problems when you reform.

I don't think they're going to repeal it.

Mitch McConnell is saying he's going to come back in on the 29th and override Trump, which

...