Throwing Elbows

Strict Scrutiny

Crooked Media

Philosophy, News, Government, Supreme Court, Society & Culture

4.8 • 4.7K Ratings

🗓️ 30 March 2020

⏱️ 75 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Leah and Jaime recap other arguments from the February sitting that was a lifetime ago! They cover Sineneng-Smith v. United States, DHS v. Thuraissigiam, and of course a case argued by that guy Paul -- Seila Law v. CFPB.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Let's keep justice. Please report.
0:04.0	It's an old joke, but when a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this,
0:09.0	they're going to have the last word.
0:12.0	She spoke not elegantly, but with unmistakable clarity.
0:17.0	She said, I ask no favor for my sex.
0:23.0	All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet or for our ex.
0:30.0	I ask no favor for my sex.
0:33.0	I ask no favor for my sex.
0:36.0	I ask no favor for my sex.
0:39.0	I ask no favor for my sex.
0:42.0	Welcome to Strix scrutiny, a podcast about the Supreme Court and the legal culture that surrounds it.
0:47.0	Hey, Leah.
0:48.0	Hi, Jamie.
0:49.0	We are your co-host today.
0:51.0	We miss Melissa and Kate, but I'm excited to be back in the saddle.
0:54.0	How are you doing today on social isolation?
0:58.0	Okay.
1:00.0	We haven't recorded an episode together in a while.
1:03.0	Yeah, it's been a bit.
1:04.0	Maybe not even before the new year.
1:06.0	It hasn't just been the two of us.
1:08.0	And since the new year was 17 years ago, it's been a really long while.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Crooked Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Crooked Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.