meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Ezra Klein Show

This Philosopher Wants Liberals to Take Political Power Seriously

The Ezra Klein Show

New York Times Opinion

Society & Culture, Government, News

4.611K Ratings

🗓️ 14 April 2023

⏱️ 64 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

America today faces a crisis of governance. In the face of numerous challenges — from climate change, to housing shortages, to pandemics — our institutions struggle to act quickly and decisively. Democratic processes often get captured by special interests or paralyzed by polarization. And, in response, public faith in government has reached a new low. For the political philosopher Danielle Allen, this crisis requires a complete transformation of our democratic institutions. “Representation as designed cannot work under current conditions,” she writes. “We have no choice but to undertake a significant project of democracy renovation.” Allen’s most recent book — “Justice By Means of Democracy” — puts forth a sweeping vision of what she calls “power-sharing liberalism,” which aims to place political equality, power and participation at the center of liberal thinking. But Allen isn’t just a theorist of liberal governance; she’s actively applying her insights in the real world. As the director of Harvard’s Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics, she’s convened interdisciplinary groups to tackle a range of challenges from building Covid-19 testing infrastructure to innovating in A.I. governance. She was co-chair of the “Our Common Purpose” commission, which put forward over 30 specific policy recommendations for reinventing American democracy. She even ran for governor of Massachusetts. So this is a conversation about what it would mean to build a better, more responsive and inclusive government — and the numerous challenges standing in the way of doing that. Along the way, we discuss liberals’ failure to take power seriously, Colorado’s experiments with “plural voting,” Seattle’s efforts to publicly finance elections through “democracy bucks,” Taiwan’s groundbreaking innovations in deliberative democracy, whether most citizens actually want deeper participation in government — or just better results from it, what it would mean to democratically govern AI development and much more. Mentioned: “Introducing Power-Sharing Liberalism” by Danielle Allen “Movement vs. Abundance Progressives” by Misha David Chellam How Democracies Die by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt “Our Common Purpose” Report “How A.I. Fails Us” Book Recommendations: The Darkened Light of Faith by Melvin L. Rogers Life 3.0 by Max Tegmark Open Democracy by Héléne Landemore Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at [email protected]. You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast, and you can find Ezra on Twitter @ezraklein. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs. This episode of “The Ezra Klein Show” is produced by Emefa Agawu, Jeff Geld, Kristin Lin, and Roge Karma. Fact-checking by Michelle Harris. Mixing by Jeff Geld. Original music by Isaac Jones. Audience strategy by Shannon Busta. The executive producer of New York Times Opinion Audio is Annie-Rose Strasser. Special thanks to Sonia Herrero and Kristina Samulewski.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Ezra Klein, this is the Ezra Conchell.

0:23.4

It's no secret that liberalism has its problems.

0:26.1

It struggles to build as much or as fast as it used to.

0:30.1

Processes meant to be small to the Democratic, get captured by special interests or paralyzed

0:34.2

by polarization.

0:36.4

Democrats have a lot of policy ideas and they even have policy wins, but they struggle

0:39.7

with the fact that they actually have to govern and so are countable for a system that

0:44.0

frustrates people.

0:46.0

On the other side, Maga conservatism, which is pretty fully taken over the Republican

0:50.2

Party at this point, it doesn't have much in the way of consistent policy ideas.

0:54.7

It doesn't take responsibility for the system.

0:57.6

And that is one place, not the only place, but one place it gets its power.

1:02.4

It's able to voice a frustration people have with the government they don't feel like

1:05.8

they have a voice in.

1:07.6

The two often seem to work only for elites or for somebody who isn't them.

1:12.7

But there are ideas out there for how liberals can break out of this stalemate.

1:17.0

Some argue for a liberalism rebuilt around outcomes or on making government able to achieve

1:22.6

what it promises.

1:24.4

People's emphasized directly addressing historic injustices bringing in groups who have been

1:29.5

left out as a way of restoring legitimacy.

1:32.6

But Daniel Allen's idea is a bit different.

1:34.6

Allen is an important political theorist and classist who's tried to turn theory into

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New York Times Opinion, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of New York Times Opinion and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.