Chapter 31.

Paul the 6th, Liberal Pope

You will perhaps wonder, how is it possible this triumph of liberalism through Pope's

John the 23rd, Paul the 6th, and through a

council, Vatican 2. Is this catastrophe reconcilable with the promises made by our Lord to St. Peter

and to his church? The gates of hell shall not prevail against it. I am with you all days, even to the consummation

of the world. I do not think that there is any contradiction. Indeed, to the extent that these

popes and the council neglected or refused to make use of their infallibility, to appeal to that

charism, which is guaranteed to them by the Holy Ghost, provided that they indeed intend to use it well.

They were able to commit doctrinal errors, or a fort fortiori to let the enemy penetrate into the

church by reason of their negligence or their complicity.

To what degree were they accomplices?

Of what faults were they culpable?

And to what extent was their office compromised?

It is indeed obvious that some day the Church will judge this council and will judge these

popes. It will certainly be necessary. How will Pope Paul VI in particular be judged? Certain people assert that he was a

heretic, schismatic, and apostate. Others believe that they can demonstrate that Paul the 6th could not have

had the good of the church in view, and that therefore he was not the Pope.

This is the thesis of the Sede Vacans, the Sedevecantis.

I do not say that these opinions do not have some arguments in their favor.

Perhaps you will tell me, in thirty years things that were hidden will be discovered.

Basic principles that should have been evident to contemporaries will be better perceived.

...