Even the best pro-choice arguments suck.

Why?

Because as it turns out, defending the indefensible is actually quite difficult to do.

However, these pro-choice arguments are heralded as the magic bullet in destroying pro-lifers.

We will lay waste to the best arguments the pro-choice movement can offer.

Save this evergreen episode and re-listen to make your pro-life apologetic

bulletproof. I'm Seth Groober and this is unabordered with Seth Groober.

Thanks for tuning in this week.

We wanted to create this sort of evergreen episode

as we've been doing a little bit more of here and there

just to provide a replay episode for you to develop this pro-life ethic, right? I call it the pro-life scaffolding of the mind.

That we're building in your mind so that when you enter the battlefield of culture or the debate over

abortion, you can enter that battlefield confidently

knowing exactly how to engage and respond to the quote unquote persuasive arguments

for dismembering humans who happened to be in a womb that was created to hold them.

So G. K. Chesterton once said that there is a thought that stops all thought, and that's the only

thought that's worth stopping.

And I think that these couple arguments

that we're going to look at that are heralded

as the pro-abortion magic bullet to lay waste to pro-lifers

represent that kind of thinking, the kind of thinking

that doesn't deserve a place in any rational political discourse, in any careful

...