This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Bruske and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reid.

Oh, there's a lot to break down in the trial of Karen Reed.

As we're about to get into week three of the trial, lots has happened, and there are a lot of things to come.

Joining me to discuss Eric Fattis, defense attorney, former prosecutor.

Yeah, we're still in the prosecution's case right now.

Of course, we're seeing a lot of very interesting cross with several of the witnesses.

Let's just start from the prosecution standpoint.

Before we start looking at some of the clips, what's been your take on how things have been going for them?

Prosecution from the first trial has really beefed up their presentation.

They've sort of done it in a refined way.

They're showing clips of Karen Reed's statements after different witnesses, which sort of show inconsistencies and

discrepancies. And on top of that, they beefed up their cell phone expert, which scored them

some points in terms of where John O'Keefe's cell phone likely would have been during this series of events.

And there was a lot of, let's start with the cell phone data because that was an interesting

one.

Of course, you have one expert saying this, this is what we found.

We dug deeper into the data.

It got kind of technical for a little bit, but I think he ended up spelling it out with

some graphics for the jury pretty well, even going as far as actually

demonstrating in court how the 225, how as long to die in cold was actually at six

something based on the browser history and the tabs and all the technicalities in that.

That, you know, it's a couple steps. Do you think the jury, do you think it

...