meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Book Review

The Uses and Misuses of Identity

The Book Review

The New York Times

Arts, Books

4.23.7K Ratings

🗓️ 31 August 2018

⏱️ 73 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Kwame Anthony Appiah talks about “The Lies That Bind: Rethinking Identity,” and Jonathan Haidt discusses “The Coddling of the American Mind.”

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

How much does identity drive our point of view and our right to assert it?

0:10.7

Kwame Anthony Abia will be here to discuss his latest book, The Lies That Bind.

0:16.0

Why are college students today so unprepared for life on campus?

0:19.7

And what are the implications for their lives afterward?

0:22.8

Jonathan Hight will be here to talk about his new book, The Coddling of the American Mind.

0:28.1

Alexander Alter will give us an update from the publishing world,

0:31.1

plus we'll talk about what we and the wider world are reading.

0:34.4

This is the Book Review Podcast from The New York Times. I'm Pamela Paul.

0:46.0

Kwame Anthony Abia joins us now. He is the ethicist column for The New York Times magazine

0:50.9

and his latest book is called The Lies That Bind, Rethinking Identity. Anthony, thanks for

0:56.5

being here. It's very good to be here. To what extent does identity currently shape our social,

1:03.1

cultural, and political discourse? I think very deeply and that's not terribly new. I think it's

1:10.4

been doing it for a long time. Indeed, if you take nationality to be kind of identity and nationalism

1:15.7

to be a kind of politics, then we've been doing a kind of identity politics ever since the beginning

1:20.6

of the Republic. But I think when people talk about the new rise of identity, what they have in

1:26.3

mind is that a whole bunch of other identities, which were not widely regarded as salient to politics,

1:32.8

say in the middle of the 20th century, like race, gender, sex, or orientation, maybe religion,

1:38.4

to some extent, have kind of come to the center of our politics in an interesting way. I think it's a

1:46.0

mistake to suggest that we could do politics without identity, as I said. We're a nation. We could

1:53.2

only do things together if we care about being Americans, and that's an identity. What I think people

1:59.1

are maybe have a case for complaining about is when we use identities to ill purpose. But using

2:05.5

them a tool, I think it's no point of being against using them a tool. But it has shifted in terms

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New York Times, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The New York Times and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.