4.8 • 14.7K Ratings
🗓️ 11 May 2023
⏱️ 57 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
More than 30 years ago, a Native American man named Al Smith was fired for ingesting peyote at a religious ceremony. When his battle made it to the Supreme Court, the decision set off a thorny debate over when religious people get to sidestep the law — a debate we’re still having today.
Voices in the episode include:
• Garrett Epps — Professor of Practice at the University of Oregon Law School
• Ka’ila Farrell-Smith — Al Smith’s daughter, visual artist
• Jane Farrell — Al Smith's widow, retired early childhood specialist
• Galen Black — Al Smith’s former coworker
• Steven C. Moore — senior staff attorney at the Native American Rights Fund
• Craig J. Dorsay — lawyer who argued Al Smith’s case before the Supreme Court
• Dan Mach — director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief
Learn more:
• 1963: Sherbert v. Verner
• 1990: Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith
• 2022: 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
• Peyote vs the State: Religious Freedom On Trial, Garrett Epps
• Factsheet: Religious Freedom Restoration Act Of 1993, The Bridge Initiative at Georgetown University
• Our History, the Klamath Tribes
Supreme Court archival audio comes from Oyez®, a free law project by Justia and the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
Support for More Perfect is provided in part by The Smart Family Fund.
Follow us on Instagram and Facebook @moreperfectpodcast, and Twitter @moreperfect.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | I'm Julia Lungoria. This is more perfect. |
0:16.0 | The first time I ever walked into the Supreme Court, |
0:20.0 | I kind of felt like church. |
0:22.0 | You walk through oversized doors into a hall of white marble, |
0:27.0 | with high arched ceilings. |
0:29.0 | People speak to each other in hushed tones, |
0:32.0 | awaiting the words of nine civil servants and robes, |
0:37.0 | who strive to answer to a higher power of sorts. |
0:41.0 | The law. |
0:43.0 | Over the last few years, |
0:45.0 | a number of religious people have been trying to tell the Supreme Court |
0:49.0 | that their God puts them above the law. |
0:54.0 | Clear win for Jack Phillips of Denver, |
0:56.0 | who said baking a cake for a same-sex couple, |
0:58.0 | would violate his Christian beliefs. |
1:00.0 | Supreme Court saying that Catholic organizations |
1:03.0 | do not have to comply with these anti-discrimination laws. |
1:07.0 | This is a big legal cause of conservatives in America, |
1:11.0 | which is telling religious institutions and religious people |
1:15.0 | that they don't have to follow the laws that everyone else has to follow. |
1:19.0 | Just this term, they accepted another case. |
1:22.0 | Where a Christian wedding website designer is asking the court |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.