meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
We the People

The Supreme Court’s First Remote Argument – A Recap

We the People

National Constitution Center

News, News Commentary, History

4.61.1K Ratings

🗓️ 7 May 2020

⏱️ 49 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments by teleconference, allowing the public to listen in, in real time, for the first time in history. On Monday, the Court heard United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com—a case about whether Booking.com can trademark its name. Immediately following the argument, host Jeffrey Rosen was joined by three experts who filed briefs on different sides of the case—Corynne McSherry of Electronic Frontier Foundation, professor Rebecca Tushnet of Harvard Law School, and Margaret Duncan of Loyola University Chicago School of Law—to recap the argument, explain the case, and reflect on a historic moment for the Court. The National Constitution Center collaborated with C-SPAN to broadcast this conversation live. The National Constitution Center recapped all of the arguments heard this past week live on C-SPAN. You can watch the rest of those recaps on our YouTube channel at YouTube.com/constitutioncenter. The Supreme Court will hear additional arguments next Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, starting at 10 a.m. EDT, and then Jeff will be back on C-SPAN to recap them with some of the leading experts involved in the cases. So please tune in! Questions or comments about the podcast? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi, We're the People listeners. I'm Jackie McDermott, the show's producer.

0:04.0

This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments by teleconference,

0:08.0

allowing the public to listen in in real time for the first time in history.

0:12.0

The first case the court heard was

0:14.0

US patent and trademark office versus booking.com which centers on whether

0:18.4

booking.com can trademark its name. Host Jeffrey Rosen was joined by three experts who filed briefs on different sides in this case,

0:26.1

to explain it and to recap the argument.

0:29.0

The National Constitution Center partnered with C-SPAN to broadcast this conversation live following the

0:34.4

argument on Monday. Here's Jeff to get the conversation started.

0:39.7

C-SPAN friends, welcome to the National Constitution Center and C-SPAN's first town hall

0:49.8

discussion of the first live Supreme Court argument in American history.

0:54.0

I am Jeffrey Rosen, the president of the National Constitution Center, which is the beautiful

1:00.1

building that you see behind me.

1:02.1

It's located in Philadelphia on Independence Mall,

1:05.6

right across from Independence Hall, where the Constitution was drafted. And like C-SPAN,

1:10.0

the National Constitution Center is a private nonprofit with an inspiring mission from Congress.

1:16.0

Our mission is to disseminate information about the Constitution on a nonpartisan basis to increase awareness and understanding of the Constitution

1:27.0

among the American people.

1:28.0

And with that in mind, we've embarked today on an exciting educational experiment.

1:35.0

We have convened America's leading scholars who have filed briefs on both sides of the

1:40.5

case that you've just heard, as well as a scholar who filed a brief on behalf of neither

1:45.0

party, to help us understand the oral arguments that we've just heard.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from National Constitution Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of National Constitution Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.