meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Daily

The Supreme Court Ends Affirmative Action

The Daily

The New York Times

Daily News, News

4.4102.8K Ratings

🗓️ 30 June 2023

⏱️ 28 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On Thursday, the Supreme Court overturned decades of precedent by striking down affirmative action and declaring that the race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina were unlawful. Adam Liptak, who covers the United States Supreme Court for The New York Times, explains the ruling, and what it means for American society. Guest: Adam Liptak, who covers the court for The New York Times.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

From the New York Times, I'm Katrin Benholdt, and this is The Daily.

0:13.1

The Supreme Court on Thursday overturned decades of precedent by striking down affirmative

0:17.2

action. Colleges and universities in America will no longer be able to use race as a factor

0:22.7

in the admissions process.

0:25.4

Today, our colleague Adam Liptak on that ruling and what it means for American society.

0:37.8

It's Friday, June 30th.

0:43.2

Adam, it's been another blockbuster term for the Supreme Court.

0:46.6

This decision today is one of the biggest in years.

0:50.0

Tell us about the ruling.

0:52.0

The Supreme Court rejected affirmative action in higher education.

0:56.9

Or more precisely, it said that race conscious admissions programs were unlawful.

1:04.6

And the court acted as we've seen many times in a classic six three divide.

1:11.5

The six Republican appointees in the majority, the three Democratic appointees in dissent,

1:18.4

an enormous decision both in its scope and even in its physical manifestation.

1:25.4

They wrote more than 200 pages, six different justices, wrote opinions.

1:29.9

And this is a major rejection of decades of important precedents.

1:35.6

At the same time, the court did leave open some ability sometimes for college and university

1:45.5

admissions personnel to take account of race at least in admissions essays.

1:52.4

Remind me of the details of the case.

1:55.4

It was brought by a group called Students for Fair Admissions,

2:00.4

which says it represents students who were disadvantaged by the admissions programs

2:07.5

at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New York Times, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The New York Times and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.