meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Lawfare Podcast

The Senate's Proposal for Electoral Count Act Reform

The Lawfare Podcast

The Lawfare Institute

Military, Intelligence, International Law, Constitutional Law, Rule Of Law, Politics, International Relations, News, Government, History, Diplomacy, Terrorism, National Security, Current Events, Law, Foreign Policy

4.76.2K Ratings

🗓️ 22 July 2022

⏱️ 58 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The false claims of election fraud and other controversies that followed the 2020 election brought to light a number of frailties in the United States system for selecting presidents. Several have their origins in the Electoral Count Act, an 1887 law whose vagaries played a central role in efforts by John Eastman and other supporters of former President Trump to keep him in the White House, despite the election results.

This past Wednesday, after months of negotiations, a bipartisan group of senators finally put forward a set of legislative reforms aimed at resolving these and other issues well in advance of the next presidential election in 2024. To determine what this reform package will do and how it may impact future elections, Scott R. Anderson sat down with Ned Foley, a leading election law expert and professor at The Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law, and Genevieve Nadeau, a counsel at Protect Democracy who has been actively engaged in reform efforts. They talked about what the reform package intends to change, what will stay the same, and how likely it is to eventually become law.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The following podcast contains advertising.

0:04.0

To access an ad-free version of the LawFair podcast,

0:08.0

become a material supporter of LawFair at patreon.com slash law fair.

0:14.0

That's patreon.com slash law fair.

0:18.0

Also, check out LawFair's other podcast offerings,

0:22.0

rational security, chatter, law fair no bull and the aftermath.

0:32.0

Right laptop, I'm ready to finish this thesis.

0:34.0

What thesis? The one I've spent two years working on.

0:36.0

Don't have it. What's the last version you saved?

0:38.0

Got final version, final final version, and no, I'm actually serious now.

0:42.0

This is the last version I will never save another version I promise.

0:46.0

Version 2. Surely that one? No.

0:48.0

Why? It's corrupted.

0:50.0

Swap. Swap. Swap.

0:52.0

For when you upgrade to an acochrome book,

0:54.0

they come with Google Drive built-in,

0:56.0

so you'll never lose a file again.

0:58.0

And save. Already saved.

1:00.0

Oh, thanks.

1:01.0

Saved it again.

1:08.0

It kind of unpacks the process.

1:10.0

You know, it has a title of this provision that accentuates the work conclusive.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Lawfare Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Lawfare Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.