The Senate's Potential Hallmark-ization of Ethics
Breakpoint
Colson Center
4.8 • 3.1K Ratings
🗓️ 21 July 2022
⏱️ 1 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
On Tuesday, the House of Representatives passed what is known as the Respect for Marriage Act. Despite its traditional-sounding name, this bill is anything but. It's an attempt to make legislatively secure what was decreed by the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges that redefined marriage for the entire nation.
It's not surprising the bill passed the progressive-controlled House, but 47 Republicans joined all the Democrats in the vote. And it seems at least possible that Dems could find 10 Republicans in the Senate, which would make the deceptively named act a law.
There's nothing conservative about the state redefining marriage and forcing it on a nation as Obergefell did. If so-called conservative lawmakers don't get that, it seems there is little left for conservatism to conserve.
Too many political conservatives are philosophically rootless. Their ideas are built on sentiment or nebulous "values" instead of the solid rocks of Scripture and common sense. If society is ever to re-embrace creational norms about marriage and family, our so-called conservatives must reject "the Hallmark-ization" of ethics. They must stop prioritizing sentiment over conviction.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Salvation will not come in Air Force One, or the halls of Congress. |
| 0:03.8 | For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street with the Point. |
| 0:06.5 | On Tuesday, the House of Representatives passed what's known as the Respect for Marriage Act. |
| 0:10.5 | Despite a traditional sounding name, the bill's anything but, it's an attempt to make legislatively secure |
| 0:15.6 | what was decreed by the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which redefined marriage for the entire nation. |
| 0:21.8 | It's not surprising the bill passed the Progressive-controlled House, but 47 Republicans |
| 0:26.6 | joined all the Democrats in this vote, and it seems at least possible that Dems could find |
| 0:31.3 | 10 Republicans in the Senate to agree, which would make the deceptively named act into a law. |
| 0:37.1 | Now, there's nothing conservative about the state, redefining marriage, and forcing it on a nation like a Bergerfeld did. |
| 0:43.2 | If so-called conservative lawmakers don't get that, it seems there may be little left for conservatism to conserve. |
| 0:49.4 | Too many political conservatives are philosophically rootless. |
| 0:52.5 | Their ideas are built on sentiment or nebulous values, |
| 0:55.3 | not the solid rocks of scripture and common sense. |
| 0:58.0 | If societies ever to reembrace creational norms about marriage and family, |
| 1:02.3 | our so-called conservatives must reject the hallmarkization of ethics. |
| 1:06.5 | They have to stop prioritizing sentiment over conviction. |
| 1:10.4 | I'm John Stone Street. |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

