The Senate Questions Pete Hegseth, as Trump's Cabinet Hearings Begin
WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch
The Wall Street Journal
4.2 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 15 January 2025
⏱️ 23 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | From the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal, this is Potomac Watch. |
| 0:07.0 | President Trump's cabinet choices begin to face their Senate confirmation hearings this week, |
| 0:14.0 | starting with Defense Secretary nominee Pete Hegeseth. |
| 0:17.0 | Did the former infantry officer and TV host do what he needed to win a majority vote and how much did the public learn about his plans for the Pentagon? |
| 0:26.0 | Welcome. I'm Kyle Peterson with the Wall Street Journal. We're joined today by my colleagues, editorial board members Kate Batchelder O'Dell and Colin Levy. |
| 0:34.6 | For more than four hours on Tuesday, Pete Hags have parried questions from the Senate |
| 0:39.2 | about his view of America's defense priorities, as well as allegations against him of heavy drinking and a 2017 claim of sexual assault. |
| 0:49.0 | And tuning into these confirmation hearings, it wasn't hard to forget how much of Congress these days plays politics as a team |
| 0:55.1 | sport. Let's start on the left side of the aisle. This is Virginia Senator Tim Kane at tangling with |
| 1:00.7 | Mr. Hegg-Zaff. You have admitted that you had sex while you were married to wife two after you just |
| 1:06.3 | had fathered a child by wife three. You've admitted that. Now, if it had been a sexual assault, |
| 1:12.0 | that would be disqualifying to be Secretary of Defense, wouldn't it? It was a false claim then |
| 1:17.2 | and a false claim now. If it had been a sexual assault, that would be disqualifying to be |
| 1:22.9 | Secretary of Defense, wouldn't it? That was a false claim. So you can't... |
| 1:27.7 | So you can't tell me whether someone who has committed a sexual assault is disqualified |
| 1:34.7 | from being Secretary of Defense? |
| 1:36.7 | Senator, I know in my instance, and I'm talking about my instance only, it was a false |
| 1:42.0 | claim. |
| 1:42.4 | But you acknowledge that you cheated on your wife and that you cheated on the woman |
| 1:48.5 | by whom you had just fathered a child. |
| 1:50.5 | You have been met at that. |
| 1:52.5 | I will allow your words to speak for them. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Wall Street Journal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Wall Street Journal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

