This is The Guardian.

When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was appointed as Donald Trump's health secretary,

he came with promises to tackle the broken food system.

We shouldn't be giving 60% of the kids in school processed food that is making them sick. We shouldn't be spending 10% of the SNAP program

on sugar drinks. And for one researcher at the forefront of nutrition science, this seemed like good news.

The rhetoric is spot on on those topics, and that's one of the reasons we were excited to

have the potential opportunity to expand on our research and provide answers to the questions

that Americans deserve.

Kevin Hall is admired by scientists around the world.

His groundbreaking research at the US National Institutes of Health

involves getting volunteers into the lab

and studying in minute detail how the modern food environment affects their bodies.

But when his findings didn't fit the administration's narrative, he says they were

downplayed. The top researcher for the National Institutes of Health shocked the scientific and medical

communities this week by announcing his early retirement and blaming it on censorship from

RFK Jr.'s administration.

The Department of Health and Human Services has rejected his claims of censorship.

Now Kevin's on the outside, continuing to follow the evidence.

In his new book with journalist Julia Ballouz called Food Intelligence,

The Science of How Food Both Nourishes and Har harms us, he interrogates everything from fad diets to glucose monitors

and supplements. These kinds of hacks and trends of supplements and wearable devices

and things like that have had limited capacity to change people's behavior over long periods of time.

...