meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Axios Re:Cap

The Other Coronavirus Test

Axios Re:Cap

Axios

Daily News, News

4.5705 Ratings

🗓️ 28 March 2020

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

You’ve heard about the need for better coronavirus testing, but there’s another test that could advance our understanding of the virus: a serological test, which measures whether people have antibodies — and possibly immunity — to the virus. Dan and Axios managing editor Alison Snyder talk about what this test could tell us.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Axisporata, where we normally take just 10 minutes to get you smarter on the collision of tech, business, and politics.

0:09.4

But today we are doing a special three-part series of shorter episodes on the coronavirus pandemic, which is changing our politics, our economy, and our way of life.

0:18.5

I'm Deppermak. This episode is about testing, not necessarily the tests you've

0:22.0

heard about or the shortages of those tests, but about the next test, which could be used to

0:26.3

help society return to normal faster. So let's go deeper with Axios Science Editor,

0:30.4

Alison Snyder. Can you explain what we're talking about here? We're talking about what they call

0:34.1

serological tests, correct? Correct. So basically, when your body is exposed to a virus, it starts to make antibodies that in future

0:44.4

will protect them from another reinfection.

0:47.3

And so this test is something that people are really interested in sort of racing to develop

0:52.0

because they want to be able to know if someone

0:54.5

who didn't have symptoms actually had already been exposed to the virus and therefore has some

1:00.8

level of immunity that would allow them to either go back to work or care for people with

1:06.3

less risk. There's been a lot of talk about, okay, if I get coronavirus and say I get tested, I know I got it,

1:12.3

then I get better. Usually you're immune to things, at least for a period of time. Do we have any

1:16.3

sense yet how long those people are actually immune to getting it again? Don't know for sure yet.

1:20.7

There is early evidence two key pieces in the past week. One is that researchers have said that

1:26.4

there's suggestions that the virus isn't

1:28.4

mutating very fast, so that bodes well for a longer lasting immunity. And then there was also a

1:34.1

study done in macaque monkeys that had been infected with the virus, and the researchers waited,

1:39.5

I think it was about a month, and tried to re-infect them again, and they weren't able to. Now, the caveat with that

1:45.3

is it's just a month. And so ideally, and I would imagine that studies happening, it will be,

1:50.4

they'll try again in, say, three months or something like that. And I assume those monkeys are

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Axios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Axios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.