Welcome back to the Audible, presented by Trader Joe's.

I'm Bruce Feldman, joined, as always by my

colleague, Stuart Mandel. A busy show today, Stu. We're in the middle of the final four run,

and we have a really good guest for our audience, UCLA A.D. Martin Jarman, we're going to get into

not only the Bruins' shocking run as an 11 seed to the

final four, but also a lot of other issues that are really relevant for Pac-12 football and really

college athletics in general. But before we get to Martin, and before we get into the mailbag after

that, there's some interesting news that came out of the Supreme Court earlier this week.

And if you follow anybody who follows college football, you probably saw it on your timeline.

So, Stu, we saw a lot of very conservative Supreme Court justices especially really pushing hard and coming after the NCAA.

As you watch this, because I know you followed it as well, what do our listeners really need to know?

Yeah, I mean, it's such a complicated issue to try to boil down.

But basically, this moment, the NCAA going before the Supreme Court for the first time

in 37 years was the culmination of something that's, a movement that's been in the works

for over a decade, right?

Everybody, I think, is familiar with the Ed O'Bannon case.

That was the first big one where basically

amateurism was on trial. And the judge in that case, and I covered that case at the time,

ruled the NCAA, ruled the NCAA was in violation of antitrust law by capping, well, at the time

was actually something pretty minor, the cost of attendance, which went into effect.

Then this suit called the Alston suit over a player from West Virginia was also fairly narrow.

It was about whether it's illegal to cap educational expenses beyond a scholarship, like whether a school should be able to buy a football

...