THE LEGAL RUMBLE: VINCE, BROCK, AND TRIPLE H UNDER FIRE (Bodyslam Briefs 2.1.25)

WRESTLING SOUP

Wrestling Soup Network

Sports, Comedy, Wrestling

4.4 • 738 Ratings

🗓️ 2 February 2025

⏱️ 19 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In this episode of Body Slam Briefs, @Dos_Evil Jeff Lippman dives deep into the recently filed amended complaint from the Grant camp. With a mix of legal analysis and candid commentary, Jeff explores the implications of the complaint, addressing speculation surrounding WWE, TKO, and key figures like Vince McMahon, Brock Lesnar, and Triple H. He shares his thoughts on the lack of new revelations in the amended complaint and reflects on the ongoing public relations battle at play.
Jeff also takes a moment to discuss the broader context of the lawsuit, including the potential outcomes of arbitration and the nature of the allegations against Lesnar and Triple H. He emphasizes the importance of understanding the difference between civil and criminal cases, while also voicing his opinions on the wrestling community's perception of these events.
This episode is packed with insights and a unique perspective on the legal intricacies surrounding the world of professional wrestling. Join Jeff as he navigates the complex landscape of legal battles and public opinion in wrestling today.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wrestling-soup--1425249/support.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Welcome to another edition of the Body Slam Briefs. It is I, Evil Ghost, Jeff Blutman, the in-house
0:08.3	counsel for the Wrestling Suit Network. Sort of knew this was going to come because the amended
0:14.2	complaint from the grant camp has been filed. This is going to be a bit of a body slam briefs
0:20.4	plus because I'm going to have some
0:22.0	editorial in this, though I wouldn't call it opinion editorial. It's more like analytical
0:27.2	editorial. I think it fits within the body slam brief theme, but it'll be a little different.
0:34.3	I think that you'll understand what I'm talking about. I hope you will
0:37.6	anyway. And I hope that most of this audience is friendly to me and gives me at least the benefit
0:43.6	of the doubt. So if I misspeak or if you don't share the same opinion that you understand that I'm
0:52.4	looking at things clinically as an attorney procedurally and not from
0:58.1	a macro level nor a moral level, nor a dispositive or I know what, you know, I know what really
1:05.8	happened.
1:06.2	I know what's going to happen level.
1:08.3	So let's start with the amended complaint.
1:12.0	There was lots of speculation as to what the amended complaint was going to be. I must confess a few shows ago, I sort of joined
1:18.6	on to the party line where I was hearing so much that they were going to be dismissing WWE
1:23.3	in TKO. And I could certainly see a dismissal of TKO, not so much WWE, that I sort of adopted it.
1:30.9	And then I think you'll recall if you listen to the more recent show or shows, I reversed on
1:35.7	that because it didn't really make any sense to me. Why would they? Why would they do that now?
1:39.2	Why wouldn't they at least wait for the arbitration motion to occur, or at least for TKO and or WWW to try to dismiss
1:46.2	themselves. Certainly the, certainly TKO has, has a case, but we talked about that. Anyway,
1:52.4	the amended complaint didn't ask for that. And then I said what I thought would be in the
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Wrestling Soup Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Wrestling Soup Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.