Hello, I really welcome back to another episode of Decoding the Unknown, hitting a big one today,

the JFK assassination. Was there really a second shooter on the grassy nail?

Kevin Jennings wrote this. Thank you, Kevin Jennings. I'm going to read it. I've never read this before.

Of course I'm familiar with the JFK assassination.

This is one of those conspiracy theories where it's a bit like, like I'm not a conspiracy guy.

I like we landed on the moon no question about it. Humans been up there but the JFK one you're like look

I don't know what went on I don't know what happens but it's weird right there's a lot of

sketchy stuff going on around that.

Like with the bullets and stuff and all of this.

I don't really know anything about it. I just know that it's weird.

Hopefully after this, I mean definitely after this is extremely long, we will all know more. Let's jump in.

I've always been of the belief that conspiracy theories is stupid. The Earth isn't

flat, man walked on the moon, the government isn't run by lizards, and there aren't Jewish

space lasers. That's not to say that conspiracies don't take place and people try to hide

their existence, but nothing can stay secret forever. There's actually a fascinating research

paper out of Oxford University addressing the matter of how long a conspiracy could be kept using data from real world conspiracies, things like MK Ultra or NSA PRISM.

Real conspiracies that were eventually leaked or used as data points.

NSA PRISM is the Snowden thing, right?

That just blows my mind every time.

I still think about that and you're like, if someone had told me that before Snowden,

I'd be like, you need to put your tin

four hat back on me, that's some crazy shit. And then Snowden's like, no, it's real.

...