4.4 • 102.8K Ratings
🗓️ 19 January 2024
⏱️ 27 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | From New York Times, I'm Michael Bobaro. This is the Daily. |
0:05.0 | This is the Daily. |
0:07.0 | This week, the Supreme Court heard a case that on its surface appears to be a |
0:18.1 | routine dispute over a government fee. In reality, it could transform how every industry in the country is regulated. |
0:31.0 | My colleague Adam Liptack explains. |
0:35.0 | It's Friday, January 19th. |
0:39.0 | Adam, welcome back to the show. |
0:45.0 | Hello Michael. |
0:46.0 | So Adam, remind us of the essential facts of this case that just ended up before the Supreme |
0:51.4 | Court a few days ago, a case that I know you see as among the most important |
0:56.5 | and consequential of this Supreme Court term. What on paper is it about? |
1:02.0 | So this case is about herring fishermen in Cape May, New Jersey. I went to |
1:07.6 | visit them and among the people I talked to was a fisherman named Bill Bright. |
1:11.8 | Well I'm I'm actually a first generation fisherman. |
1:15.8 | I've been fishing for 40 years. |
1:19.2 | I actually quit my union job to try fishing and I've been fishing ever since. |
1:25.0 | Can I ask you how old you're? |
1:27.0 | 64. |
1:29.0 | I'm 63, so you're a polger. |
1:32.0 | Probably not wiser. |
1:34.0 | And they told me that they have long been living under a 1976 law that requires them to take federal observers out with them on their |
1:47.0 | fishing trips, they go out for a week at a time, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New York Times, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The New York Times and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.