meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
New Discourses

The End of Civil Rights in Kimberlé Crenshaw's "Mapping the Margins"

New Discourses

New Discourses

Education

4.82.4K Ratings

🗓️ 15 March 2021

⏱️ 107 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 25 In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, James Lindsay continues his abridged reading of Kimberlé Crenshaw's famous (or infamous) paper, "Mapping the Margins," which appeared in the Stanford Law Review in 1991. While not the birthplace of intersectionality, this paper is the first full-throated appeal for its application, not just in the world but also in the movements from which it was born: radical feminism and black liberationism. In part 1 of this series, James read the introduction to the paper, wherein he claims the Woke One Ring was forged to form one model of systemic oppression to rule them all: intersectionality, by which all the radical and civil rights movements were ensnared and brought under the dominion of postmodern neo-Marxist thought. Here, in part 2, James reads through the conclusion of "Mapping the Margins" and illustrates exactly how Crenshaw's ideas will achieve the complete subordination and redirection of all leftist, left-wing, and civil-rights thought. This episode of the New Discourses podcast is the second part of a two-part series reading an abridged version of Crenshaw's "Mapping the Margins." You can find Part 1 here: https://newdiscourses.com/2021/03/forging-woke-one-ring-kimberle-crenshaws-mapping-margins/ Support New Discourses: paypal.me/newdiscourses newdiscourses.locals.com/support patreon.com/newdiscourses subscribestar.com/newdiscourses youtube.com/channel/UC9K5PLkj0N_b9JTPdSRwPkg/join Website: https://newdiscourses.com Follow: facebook.com/newdiscourses twitter.com/NewDiscourses instagram.com/newdiscourses newdiscourses.locals.com pinterest.com/newdiscourses linkedin.com/company/newdiscourses minds.com/newdiscourses reddit.com/r/NewDiscourses Podcast: @newdiscourses podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/new-…es/id1499880546 bit.ly/NDGooglePodcasts open.spotify.com/show/0HfzDaXI5L4LnJQStFWgZp stitcher.com/podcast/new-discourses © 2021 New Discourses. All rights reserved.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello everybody welcome back you are listening to the new discourses podcast. I am James

0:26.0

Lindsay we are in the midst of another paper reading series so much like I read Herbert

0:33.8

Marcuses repressive tolerance and four parts I'm now reading an abridged

0:38.3

version in fact a very abridged version of Kimberly Crenshaw's most famous

0:43.5

paper mapping the margins intersectionality identity politics and violence

0:47.5

against women of color which was published in 1991 in a Stanford law review if

0:53.3

you don't know who Kimberly Crenshaw is she is the founder of intersectionality and one

0:58.4

of the founders with her mentor Derek Bella Harvard Law of critical race theory in

1:04.9

fact Kimberly Crenshaw is credited with naming both intersectionality and critical

1:11.1

race theory so she's a significant player at the beginning of part one of this two

1:17.5

part series where I read the introduction to this paper I will now read the

1:21.0

conclusion for part two I outlined kind of who Kimberly Crenshaw is in a little

1:26.3

bit more detail pointed out that she has been a professor at UCLA and that she

1:31.3

runs a very well-funded entity called the African American policy forum now to

1:36.5

still alive still active still vigorously pumping out the garbage identity

1:42.3

politics that she unrepentantly advocates for in this paper 30 years ago and I

1:50.7

make the argument that this paper in fact is significant in having changed the

1:56.5

world and in my opinion not for the better and I think that most of us will

2:00.5

start to agree over time if you're not already there if you're listening to me

2:03.7

you may already be there that this paper has been significant and changed the

2:07.0

world significantly for the worse in fact I referred in the first part of this

2:12.7

to saying I said that in this paper is where the ring of power was forged the

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New Discourses, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of New Discourses and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.