I think it's fair to say that by now most people around the whole world are pretty familiar with the narrative

that our planet is facing a dire crisis due to rising temperatures.

The general premise of this narrative, it was laid off fairly well in January of last year

when Al Gore was giving a presentation to the World Economic Forum and he said the following,

quote, greenhouse gas emissions are now trapping as much extra heat as would be released by 600,000

Hiroshima-class atomic bombs exploding every single day on the Earth.

That's what is boiling the oceans, creating these atmospheric rivers and the rain bombs and sucking the moisture out of the land and creating the droughts and melting the ice and raising the sea level and causing these waves of climate refugees.

Likewise, 13 months after that gloomy speech in February of this year,

you had the same doomsday apocalyptic message being echoed by the United Nations Secretary General who said this during

this year's United Nations Environment Assembly.

Quote, our planet is on the brink.

Ecorest systems are collapsing, our climate is imploding, and humanity is to blame.

Now, here's the thing though.

Despite the ubiquitous number of articles that have been published saying that there is definitely a universal consensus in the scientific community surrounding this climate narrative,

well not all scientists agree and the ones that don't are not quacks.

Case in point, you have Mr. John Closer who won the Nobel Prize in physics back in the year

2022 and Mr. Clauzer he sees the data differently. Speaking last year by the

topic here's what he said quote the popular narrative about climate change

reflects a dangerous corruption of science

that threatens the world's economy and the well-being of billions of people.

Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock journalism pseudoscience. In my opinion, there is no real climate

crisis. And so a good question at this point would be, how can there be such a vast discrepancy

...