The Continental-Analytic Split

In Our Time: Philosophy

BBC

History

4.5 • 1.3K Ratings

🗓️ 10 November 2011

⏱️ 42 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Melvyn Bragg and his guests discuss the Continental-Analytic split in Western philosophy. Around the beginning of the last century, philosophy began to go down two separate paths, as thinkers from Continental Europe explored the legacy of figures including Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger, while those educated in the English-speaking world tended to look to more analytically-inclined philosophers like Bertrand Russell and Gottlob Frege. But the divide between these two schools of thought is not clear cut, and many philosophers even question whether the term 'Continental' is accurate or useful.The Analytic school favours a logical, scientific approach, in contrast to the Continental emphasis on the importance of time and place. But what are the origins of this split and is it possible that contemporary philosophers can bridge the gap between the two? With:Stephen MulhallProfessor of Philosophy at New College, University of OxfordBeatrice Han-PileProfessor of Philosophy at the University of EssexHans Johann-Glock Professor of Philosophy at the University of ZurichProducer: Natalia Fernandez.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Thanks for downloading the In Our Time podcast. For more details about In Our Time and for our terms of use, please go to BBC.co.uk.
0:09.0	I hope you enjoy the program.
0:12.0	Hello, about a hundred years ago the discipline of philosophy seemed split into two main
0:17.1	camps.
0:18.1	One is known today as the Analytic School, the other as the Continental.
0:21.9	The founders of the analytic tradition who included Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein
0:26.4	believed it should be as impersonal and exact as the sciences. For them it was logic and language,
0:31.7	rather than human experience
0:33.1	that would answer the important questions.
0:35.2	Continental philosophers such as Martin Heidegger on the other hand rejected this
0:38.8	approach and commonly they were not just using different methods but
0:42.0	asking different questions.
0:43.4	For much of the last century philosophers have been categorized as either analytic or
0:47.5	continental and there have been some bitter exchanges between the two camps.
0:50.9	But what are the differences between them? How deeper
0:53.5	divide really exists and could the two traditions ever reunite with me to
0:57.5	discuss the Continental Analytic Split are Stephen Mulhall, Professor of
1:01.6	Philosophy at New College University of Oxford, Beatrice Han Stephen Mulhullhullhullhullh,
1:04.0	Beatrice Han Pyle, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Essex,
1:08.0	and Hans Shehuhan Glock, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Zurich.
1:12.0	Stephen Mulhull, let's start with the analytic tradition.
1:14.5	When did it begin and who were its founding figures?
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.