The Chrisley's Sentencing Part I
The Bravo Docket
The Docket, LLC
4.8 • 2.3K Ratings
🗓️ 6 December 2022
⏱️ 63 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Todd and Julie Chrisley were sentenced on November 22, 2022 after a jury found them guilty of many federal criminal charges including conspiracy to commit bank fraud, bank fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit tax evasion.The sentencing involved the government and Todd and Julie submitting memorandums outlining what sentences they believed they deserved based on the crimes committed, level of responsibility taken, prior crimes, and more. We discuss how sentences are calculated and what specific arguments, with evidence, the government made in its submission. This is a great precursor to Jen Shah's sentencing as the procedure will be the same.
The second part of this episode will be out later this week
Access our Patreon, Instagram, Website, YouTube, and more here: https://linktr.ee/thebravodocket The Bravo Docket podcast, the statements we make whether in our own media or elsewhere, and any content we post are for entertainment purposes only and do not provide legal advice. Any party consuming our information should consult a lawyer for legal advice. The podcast, our opinions, and our posts, are our own and are not associated with our employers, Bravo TV, or any other television network.
Become a member at https://plus.acast.com/s/thebravodocket.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | In reality television, the people are represented by two separate but equally obsessed attorneys. |
| 0:06.4 | This is their podcast. |
| 0:18.8 | Hi, I'm Sessie, and I'm Angela, and this is the Bravo Docket. |
| 0:24.8 | Hello everyone and welcome back to the Bravo Docket. |
| 0:28.0 | So we were originally going to be talking about Jen Shaw's sentencing. |
| 0:32.7 | However, that was recently moved to January 6th. |
| 0:38.2 | However, since then, Todd and Julie Chrisley received their sentence. |
| 0:44.0 | So we figured this would be the perfect time to discuss their sentence, |
| 0:48.7 | give a refresher on how sentencing works, in light of Jen Shaw's upcoming sentencing, |
| 0:55.3 | and for those curious, her new dates, her submission is due December 16th. |
| 1:00.8 | The government's submission is due December 23rd, and the hearing is January 26th, |
| 1:06.4 | and we're going to be discussing submissions in Todd and Julie Chrisley's sentencing |
| 1:11.1 | to give you some insight into what the sentencing submissions might look like in Jen Shaw's. |
| 1:16.2 | And I wanted to touch on the fact that everyone in our comments when we posted about the |
| 1:21.5 | dates changing. We're like, oh no, Jen Shaw gets special treatment and how dare she move it, |
| 1:27.6 | and she's just pushing it out for no reason. And this happens all the time in civil and |
| 1:33.6 | criminal cases, deadlines and dates and hearing dates get pushed constantly. |
| 1:38.7 | In this case, I think it was an agreement between Jen Shaw's counsel and the prosecution to move |
| 1:45.1 | it. It could be anything from demands on the attorney side, like maybe they have another case coming |
| 1:51.6 | up. It could be as simple as they want to take a vacation during the holidays. So it's not |
| 1:58.8 | something so out of the ordinary. It doesn't necessarily mean that Jen Shaw is getting preferential |
| 2:05.2 | treatment. She likely isn't the judge doesn't care who Jen Shaw is or isn't. It's just a procedural |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Docket, LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Docket, LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.