meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Case is Submitted

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

The Heritage Foundation

Government

4.5527 Ratings

🗓️ 1 July 2024

⏱️ 28 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The term is over, and what an ending it was! Presidents are entitled to broad immunity for official acts, Chevron deference is no more, the Seventh Amendment applies against the administrative state, nobody gets to sue over social media censorship, and the 8th Amendment does not prohibit anti-camping laws. These are the holdings of just a few of the blockbuster cases released in the last few days of this term. After your hosts discuss those cases, GianCarlo gets one last chance to stump Zack in trivia, and then they follow the Court into the summer recess.


Over the summer, your hosts arrange interviews with judges, lawyers, and experts, so please let them know if there are any people you'd like them to interview or legal issues you'd like them to cover in depth next term.


Follow us on X @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.


Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.


Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court.

0:05.5

I'm John Carlo Conoparo.

0:07.3

I'm Zach Smith.

0:08.4

And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court,

0:13.3

what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

0:20.9

Welcome back to another episode of SCOTUS 101.

0:24.2

The court finally concluded its long term.

0:27.7

It spilled over into July, but it saved some of the biggest decisions of the term for its very last day.

0:33.8

Zach, why don't you start us off with maybe, depending on your perspective, the biggest case of the

0:39.0

term, Trump versus the United States? Yeah, this was certainly a case that I think everyone was

0:44.5

very anxious for the court to release. And now that it has been released, it certainly didn't

0:49.7

disappoint. This was a 6 to 3 decision by Chief Justice John Roberts, where he was joined by

0:55.0

Justice Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. They all joined the Chief Justice in full,

1:00.4

and Justice Barrett joined the Chief's opinion, except as to Part 3C. Now, this decision at the end

1:07.7

of the day was a big win for Donald Trump and a big win for the presidency

1:12.1

more broadly because the court held that presidents enjoy absolute immunity for actions

1:18.1

taken within their, quote, conclusive and preclusive sphere of authority that the Constitution

1:24.0

granted to them. Think pardons. The Constitution clearly gives the President the power

1:29.1

to pardon individuals, and regardless of whether Congress passes any law trying to restrict

1:34.3

that power, passes a law trying to criminalize that power, that doesn't matter. The President

1:40.1

clearly has that power according to the Constitution and would enjoy absolute immunity for

1:46.4

any actions he takes around exercising that power. Now, the court also held that presidents

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.