meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

The Book Club: Ravenous

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

Society & Culture, News Commentary, News, Daily News

4.3826 Ratings

🗓️ 29 March 2023

⏱️ 45 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On this week's Book Club podcast my guests are the former government food tsar Henry Dimbleby and his wife and co-author Jemima Lewis, to talk about their new book Ravenous: How To Get Ourselves and Our Planet Into Shape. They tell me about the perils and pleasures of working with your spouse, why exercise doesn't make you lose weight, what we don't understand about nutrition, when the state needs to take a hand in consumer choice -- and why sending Liz Truss a picture of a sheep's mutilated backside might not have been the best idea.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator magazine combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority. Absolutely free. Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash voucher.

0:28.6

Hello and welcome to The Spectator's Book Club podcast. I'm Sam Leith, the literary editor for The Spectator, and this week I'm very pleased to be joined by Henry Dimbleby who until very recently

0:38.5

was the government's food saw and his co-author and wife the journalist jemimaim and Lewis

0:43.5

their new book being ravenous how to get ourselves and our planet into shape now

0:49.7

gas bezal ask you since we've got what you deplore in the book as a buy one get one free offer in having both of you here as co-authors,

0:58.4

how the process of putting this book together was.

1:02.2

I mean, among other things, working with your partner is a high-risk activity.

1:09.0

Yes.

1:10.4

A lot of people have asked us how we manage this and also have expressed their own

1:16.5

incredulity and said that they would kill their husband or wife if they had to work

1:19.9

with them.

1:20.5

But actually, I think the best working partnerships usually happen where one person is much better

1:27.0

at one thing than the other and vice versa.

1:29.7

And in this case, I'm a better writer than him, but he's a much better thinker than me.

1:34.3

And so it worked out rather well. There was a clear division of duties. He's a good, he's not a bad writer, actually. He's a good writer.

1:43.2

She described my writing at the book launch as serviceable.

1:49.3

That's one for the anniversary party.

1:53.3

But he writes the way he thinks in a great sort of unerated kind of torrent of thoughts, tumbling over each other very dense and he he he

2:04.7

because all this knowledge is in his head he doesn't sort of he doesn't pull it out and leave it to air

2:11.3

the way highly calerific you know highly calerific whip it into a meringue i mean canary canary

2:16.7

dense the thing that i think is really interesting about for me i mean it was it highly calerific. Whip it into a meringue. I mean, canary, cannery dense.

2:20.5

The thing that I think is really interesting about, for me,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.