4.2 • 639 Ratings
🗓️ 31 August 2015
⏱️ 3 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Understanding the human body is a team effort. That's where the Yachtel group comes in. |
0:05.8 | Researchers at Yachtolt have been delving into the secrets of probiotics for 90 years. |
0:11.0 | Yacold also partners with nature portfolio to advance gut microbiome science through the global grants for gut health, an investigator-led research program. |
0:19.6 | To learn more about Yachtolt, visit yawcult.co. |
0:22.7 | .jp. That's Y-A-K-U-L-T.C-O.J-P. When it comes to a guide for your gut, count on Yacolt. |
0:34.3 | This is Scientific Americans' 60-second science. I'm Karen Hopkins. This will just take a minute. |
0:40.5 | When it comes to communicating ideas, brevity is all the rage. Take a look at Twitter, |
0:45.6 | which allows just 140 characters to speak your piece. Now scientists, it seems, could learn a lesson |
0:51.6 | from the power of the tweet, because a new study shows that |
0:54.5 | scientific papers with shorter titles receive more citations. The article, tidily entitled |
1:00.6 | the advantage of short paper titles, is in the Royal Society Journal Open Science. Scientific careers |
1:06.4 | can be made or waylaid on the basis of publications, and the success of individual articles is often |
1:12.1 | determined by how frequently those papers are referenced in other publications. But what makes a paper |
1:17.5 | popular? Previous studies of the length of an article's title have yielded mixed findings, perhaps due to relatively |
1:23.7 | small sample sizes. So researchers decided to cast a wider net. Fishing in an academic |
1:29.4 | database called Scopus, they pulled out the most highly cited 20,000 papers for each of the seven years |
1:35.2 | from 2007 to 2013, and they found that papers with tercer titles topped the citation count. |
1:42.4 | Even when the researchers took into account the journal in which the |
1:45.3 | publication appeared, some have stricter restrictions on title length than do others, the findings held |
1:50.5 | true. Of course, title length isn't everything. The article's content and subject area obviously |
1:56.7 | attract different levels of interest. But a snappy title can't hurt. I mean, which would you |
2:02.3 | rather read? An article from the Journal of Immunology with the title, exposure of phosphatidyl |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Scientific American, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Scientific American and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.