3 • 791 Ratings
🗓️ 30 April 2025
⏱️ 24 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Brewski and continuing coverage of the case against Karen Reid. |
0:07.5 | When the truth feels blurred under inches of snow and a mountain of doubt, the courtroom becomes the only place left to dig. |
0:16.6 | In the case of Karen Reid, the prosecution claims this is a clear-cut vehicular homicide, maybe even second-degree murder, that she hit Boston police officer John O'Keefe with her SUV in a drunken haze or rage, depending on which charges you want to believe, and left him to die. |
0:36.2 | The defense on the other side argues that she's not just innocent. |
0:40.1 | She's the fall girl in a cover-up orchestrated to protect those inside that house. |
0:46.9 | Two drastically different stories. |
0:49.6 | One, a shattered tail light. |
0:52.4 | No camera rolling, but it all went down. Today on Hidden Killers, |
0:56.9 | we're joined by former prosecutor and criminal defense attorney Eric Fannis to break down |
1:00.6 | how the case is being built and unbuilt in real time. Eric, let's start with the heart of all |
1:06.1 | of this. The case hinges not on someone seeing what happened, but on how jurors interpret what Karen Reed |
1:13.3 | may have said, felt, or even implied in a moment of crisis. As a legal expert here, how |
1:20.3 | dangerous is it when a case leans more on emotional interference than direct evidence? And is |
1:26.4 | that ever enough to convict beyond a reasonable |
1:30.3 | doubt? Yeah, Tony, in nearly every case, the jury is going to be focused on what the defendant |
1:37.1 | did, what the defendant said, what the defendant's demure was, because they believe that that will |
1:42.1 | give them some insight into what you know, what the defendant |
1:45.8 | knows in terms of what played out. That being said, we've always got to be cautious when a jury |
1:52.2 | is considering that type of emotional evidence because, you know, really, you know, direct, hard, |
1:57.9 | concrete evidence. That is sound. That is solid. That's not open to misinterpretation, |
2:03.0 | whereas, you know, human beings' words and how they are emoting is. Very, very true. And there's so many |
2:10.3 | things that, like everyone just trying to dissect, what did Karen Reed mean by this? How did she feel |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 26 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.