Welcome to the advisory opinions podcast. This is David French with Sarah Isger. Lots of Supreme Court developments Sarah take it away.

Okay, first of all, perhaps the most important Supreme Court development. Our Halloween costumes this year in our house were particularly noteworthy. I think to A.O. listeners. I dressed in all red. Scott dressed in all blue.

That's right. We were Supreme Court briefs in the case of US versus nap times and diaper changes and we dressed the brisket up as no Francesco the former solicitor general.

Basically because no is a big fan of wearing those like collared sweater e things.

And I happen to be able to find one of those and I couldn't find a morning suit for a baby and I was not going to go bespoke.

So yeah, it was I really enjoyed it. Now of course you have to know that Supreme Court briefs are color coded. There's in fact there's very strict rules on the color that the top of your brief has to be.

So we were petitioner and respondent.

So I have just a mild bone to pick with you here Sarah.

Uh-huh.

So I'm I'm really fascinated by the costume. It is it's a great costume. I applaud the creativity.

But we have a very short amount of time and just just moments before you launched into your costume soliloquy.

You were like, got to go, got to go, got to go. Let's go. Let's go. Let's go. That's right.

And it was to start the costume conversation.

Yes, I think that's really important news that I needed to share with people. Look, here's some less important news.

The qualified immunity case that we talked about last week that was up in conference.

This was the question of a guy who was taping police officers. The police then tried to confiscate his recording.

They have been told by their police department that they couldn't do that. They did it anyway.

Do you need a judicially clearly established constitutional right?

The Supreme Court said we don't care and they denied search.

Uh, they also denied search and a case I was very interested in.

This is the Ohio commission of elections that says they will have three Republican members, three Democratic members.

And then those guys will all pick one additional member to have seven total the libertarian party sued and said, uh, this, you know, two party system is not right.

...