For the first time in almost three full years, the U.S. Supreme Court has finally agreed

to take on a case related to January 6 prisoners.

In this case, it can have huge ramifications, not only for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit,

but also for almost everyone else who has been charged with obstruction of Congress, which

includes President Donald Trump himself.

Now let me break down for you exactly what this case is all about.

To start with, the Department of Justice keeps a special page on their website, which

is devoted to listing out the indictments that they've issued in relation to what happened

over on January 6.

And if you scroll through that list, you'll find that the most widely charged felony is

obstruction.

Specifically, almost 330 defendants, alongside President Trump himself, have been charged

with corrupt lip-structing and official proceeding, with the official proceeding being

a joint session of Congress that was convened to certify the Electoral College votes on

January 6.

And this obstruction charge is a felony.

However, many of the defendants are arguing that the underlying statute that they're

being charged under is actually being completely misinterpreted by the federal courts.

Because you see, the specific law that these individuals are being charged under, this

law right here, the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, otherwise known as the Corporate and

Auditing Accountability Responsibility and Transparency Act.

Now this law was passed by Congress back in the year 2002, shortly after the financial

...