meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Quillette Podcast

Stuart Buck on How COVID-19 Has Exposed the Shortfalls of Scientific Peer Review

Quillette Podcast

Quillette

Society & Culture, Politics, News, Science, News Commentary

4.6 • 917 Ratings

🗓️ 10 October 2020

⏱️ 23 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Quillette Editor Jonathan Kay talks to Stuart Buck about how the rapid pace of COVID-19 science has exposed longstanding problems with the methods we use to validate scientific research Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the Colette Podcast. My name is Claire Lehman and I am editor and chief of Colette.

0:08.0

Colette is where free thought lives. We are an independent grassroots platform for heterodox ideas and fearless commentary.

0:15.0

Our podcast is a team effort and is jointly hosted by myself, associate editor Toby Young,

0:20.0

and Canadian editor Jonathan Kay.

0:22.0

You can support our podcast by visiting... Toby Young and Canadian editor Jonathan Kay.

0:22.9

You can support our podcast by visiting Patreon.com forward slash Colette and becoming a monthly patron.

0:29.2

By becoming a monthly patron you'll also receive our weekly newsletter.

0:33.0

Welcome to the Quillett podcast.

0:36.0

I'm Jonathan Kay.

0:37.0

In 1935, Albert Einstein and a younger colleague named Nathan Rosen

0:42.0

sent a controversial paper on gravitational

0:44.9

waves to physical review. The editor sent the article to a reviewer for comments.

0:49.8

This was part of a process that we now commonly call peer review, but when the editor reported back to Einstein with the reviewer's comments, Einstein was angry.

0:59.0

Quote, we had sent you our manuscript for publication and had not authorized you to show it to specialists before it was printed,

1:06.3

Einstein wrote.

1:07.3

I see no reason to address the, in any case erroneous comments of your anonymous expert.

1:14.0

On the basis of this incident, I prefer to publish the paper elsewhere.

1:18.2

The famous incident helped show that the process we call scientific peer review by which experts in a field evaluate research

1:25.0

before it's published is relatively modern and as the COVID pandemic shows it has its flaws in terms

1:32.2

of both false negatives and false positives.

1:35.1

Much of the most valuable science on COVID-19 is being published without much scientific oversight.

1:40.7

On the other hand, some leading journals have summarily reviewed and published research

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Quillette, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Quillette and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.