Presented by Team Mobile, the official wireless partner of Odyssey Sports.

With an awesome network and great savings, there's never been a better time to join Team Mobile.

Visit your neighborhood store to make the switch today.

So Steve Souter was back for another film breakdown on my podcast yesterday. Steve has been doing it for me all year long.

Steve, the game analyst with Johnny Holliday on all of

Maryland's football games, and Steve, one of the greatest punt returners in the history

of college football. So one of the reasons he was excited to kind of watch this particular

all-22 and break it down is he wanted to see if there was a big difference between the way Dan Quinn called the

defense and the way Joe Witt Jr. was calling the defense. So at first, I asked him just for

his big takeaways from the game Sunday in Madrid.

Roll the ball in offense. And they did that. So they did a good job offensively of keeping

their defense off the field.

They just couldn't punch it in there when they got inside the red zone, but did a good job

of maintaining the run game staying ahead of the change.

They didn't do much to hurt themselves by the way of penalties, holding calls, etc.

They didn't have many negative first down plays.

So you're doing well

from an offense. You can keep your play caller in Kingsbury in rhythm if you're getting

production on first down, so they did a decent job with that. It just couldn't, unfortunately,

couldn't, you know, cap those off with touchdown. So offensively did what they had to do

to win the football game until a couple of the key players where they didn't make. And then defensively, thoughts are, I know we talked last week, and I'll start with it because it was what I was really interested in watching, is just a difference in play-call and would I notice a difference from Dan Quinn? Would there be different play-calling situations that I could specifically point my finger to and say,

yeah, that's different.

...