Ladies and gentlemen, keep in mind that the Epstein files were in existence and freedom

have been opened during the Biden administration.

You were there for four years.

How come you didn't open it as a Democratic Party then?

What am I missing?

I'm not saying I know.

It's a legitimate question.

Maybe I don't remember the answer.

Maybe my extraordinary producers should be able to help me during the commercial break. But from my understanding, the same files that were open or being open now with the 220 pages of documents or whatever it is

with various emails that could have been done when Biden was in office well why didn't you do it

if it's so important now.

What were the Democrats doing at that particular moment of time?

This is the kind of stuff that smells.

Because my attitude is just deducing how much they despise Trump is

if there was some real bona fide dirt on them,

since you went after him with the 34 felony convictions,

which essentially was deduced to him paying hush money

to Stormy Daniels, a porn star.

So she wouldn't reveal their happenings with one another leading up to the election in 2016.

Okay.

If you had something like that that you were willing to parade him through the streets with,

of course, if you had something on him about Epstein, you'd have let it go earlier to make sure he didn't become the 47th president. That's just my thinking from a logical perspective. But what do I know? You know a lot. Yeah. You know a lot. Not just about the New York Knickerbockers or you're right about Lane Kiffin, too. Stephen, he ain't standing on Miss. I don't care how mad Paul Feinbaum is. You know a lot, and Stephen A. Smith making a lot of sense right there.

...